Psoriasis dermatitis, a common phenotype of early forms of both psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in children: A prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis (Ps) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are chronic systemic immune-mediated diseases that can coexist in an overlapping condition called psoriasis dermatitis (PD). PD patients have intermediate lesions with characteristics of both Ps and AD. PD is very rare in adults but much more frequent in children. Little is known, however, about the course of PD in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the percentage of PD cases in children that evolved to a definite form of Ps or AD and to identify any clinical or epidemiological variables that could predict the course of the disease. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study of children diagnosed with PD between January 2018 and December 2020. We collected participants' clinical and epidemiological characteristics, and pediatric dermatologists determined the percentage of participants who developed Ps or AD. RESULTS: The study included 24 children with PD, with a median age of 7.0 years. After a median follow-up period of 31 months, 83.3% of cases had evolved to a definite form of Ps or AD (44.4% to Ps and 38.9% to AD). Younger age and family history of Ps were associated with progression to AD. Participants who progressed to AD or Ps had a longer follow-up than those with an unchanged PD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Given sufficient time, a large percentage of PD cases in children will evolve into Ps or AD. Long-term clinical follow-up is necessary for a correct diagnosis.

Dose reduction is a feasible strategy in patients with plaque psoriasis who achieve sustained response with secukinumab: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study in daily practice setting.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapy dose modification is a common practice in the long-term treatment of plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine prevalence, characteristics of patients, effectiveness, treatment survival of secukinumab dose reduction (SEC-DR) strategy and assess its safety and cost implications. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study was conducted in patients with plaque psoriasis treated with secukinumab and up to 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: In 63/347 patients with an initial standard dose regimen, SEC-DR was tried at any moment in 18.2% of them after sustained response. In 51 patients, the interval between administrations was increased while in 12 patients, monthly dose was reduced to 150 mg. Successful SEC-DR was achieved in 77.8% of the patients, with sustained PASI response to the end of the study. Survival of secukinumab treatment and safety profile were not compromised by DR. The use of DR saved 33% of the cost, including failures in which standard treatment was resumed. LIMITATIONS: The proper of the study designed and the arbitrary definition of "DR success." CONCLUSION: Off-label SEC-DR strategy was used in patients with sustained response to standard dose regimen; this strategy showed long-term efficacy without compromising treatment survival or worsening the safety profile while also being cost saving.

Safety of biologic therapy in combination with methotrexate in moderate to severe psoriasis: a cohort study from the BIOBADADERM registry.

BACKGROUND: Safety is an important consideration in decisions on treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and the study of drug safety is the main purpose of the BIOBADADERM registry. The combination of a biologic agent and a conventional systemic drug [generally methotrexate (MTX)] is a common treatment in clinical practice. However, there is a paucity of evidence from real-world practice on the safety of such combination regimens in the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to ascertain whether the use of regimens combining biologic drugs with MTX in the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis increases the risk of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs). We compared monotherapy using tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors with the use of the same drugs in combination with MTX. METHODS: Using data from the BIOBADADERM registry, we compared biologic monotherapies with therapies that were combined with MTX. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) using a random effects Poisson regression with 95% confidence intervals for all AEs, SAEs, infections and serious infections and other AEs by system organ class. RESULTS: We analysed data from 2829 patients and 5441 treatment cycles, a total of 12 853 patient-years. The combination of a biologic with MTX was not associated with statistically significant increases in overall risk of AEs or SAEs in any treatment group. No increase in the total number of infections or serious infections in patients receiving combined therapy was observed for any group. However, treatment with a TNF inhibitor combined with MTX was associated with an increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal AEs (aIRR 2.50, 95% CI 1.57-3.98; P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of AEs and SAEs was not significantly increased in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving different classes of biologic drugs combined with MTX compared with those on biologic monotherapy.

Secukinumab is effective and safe in the long-term treatment of plaque psoriasis in a daily practice setting: Multicenter study in 384 Spanish patients.

The aim of the study was to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in Spanish patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a daily practice setting. Nationwide multicenter, observational, retrospective, non-interventional, single-cohort study including patients who initiated treatment with secukinumab in daily clinical practice conditions. Subjects were followed for a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 24 months. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area and Physician's Global Assessments were collected at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 during treatment. Adverse events and reasons for secukinumab withdrawal were collected and classified for analyses. A total of 384 patients were enrolled in the study. Median PASI declined rapidly from 14.3 at baseline to 2.7 at month 3, 2.1 at month 12, and remained low (2.8) at month 24. Within the group of patients with PASI ≥10 at baseline (n = 278), 58.3%, 60.4% and 56.5% achieved a PASI90 response at months 3, 12 and 24, respectively. As for absolute PASI, 86.5%, 69.5%, 42.7% and 37% achieved PASI <5, < 3, < 1 and 0, respectively, at month 3. Secukinumab was more effective in biologic-naïve patients and in those with lower Body Mass Index. Secukinumab presented a good long-term safety profile. Secukinumab was effective and safe in a routine clinical setting, in a large cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, in the short-, medium- and long-term (up to 24 months).

Fast and sustained improvement of patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic patients treated with secukinumab in a daily practice setting.

Psoriasis is a chronic dermatological disease with great impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of secukinumab treatment on different patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during a long-term follow-up in Spanish patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis under real-world conditions. Retrospective, observational, open-label, nationwide multicenter cohort study that included patients who initiated treatment with secukinumab in daily clinical practice conditions. PROs assessing disease impact and QoL included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient's Global Psoriasis Assessment, Itch Numerical Rating Scale and EuroQoL Thermometer Visual Analogue Scale. Outcomes, including PROs and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), were assessed at months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 during treatment. A total of 238 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients had a mean DLQI score of 14.9 at baseline; 78.3%, 73.7%, and 71.7% of them achieved a DLQI 0/1 response at months 6, 12, and 24, respectively. DLQI score was lower in the long term for naïve patients. A sharp decrease in mean DLQI was observed during the first 3 months, reaching a plateau that was maintained until the end of follow-up. Similar findings were observed for the rest of QoL assessments. There was a close association between improvement in QoL and skin clearance (PASI), which progressively increased during follow-up. In this study, secukinumab sustainably improved patient's QoL during a 24-month follow-up, with strongest effects in patients naïve to biological therapies and with a direct correlation with PASI improvement.

The risk of hepatic adverse events of systemic medications for psoriasis: a prospective cohort study using the BIOBADADERM registry.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the risk of incident liver disease in patients with psoriasis receiving systemic therapies. OBJECTIVES: To describe the liver safety findings of conventional and modern systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, and to compare the relative incidence rates of hepatic adverse events (AEs) for each drug. METHODS: All the patients on the BIOBADADERM registry were included. Crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (cIRR and aIRR, respectively) of hepatic AEs, using anti-TNF drugs as reference, were determined. Outcomes of interest were hypertransaminasemia, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NADFLD) and a group of other, less represented, hepatic AEs. RESULTS: Our study included 3,171 patients exposed to systemic drugs (6279 treatment cycles). Incident hypertransaminasemia was the most frequent hepatic AE (incidence rate of 21 per 1000 patients-years [CI 95% 18-23]), followed by NAFLD (8 cases per 1000 patients-years [95% CI 6-10]). Methotrexate (aIRR 3.06 [2.31-4.4]; p = 0.000) and cyclosporine (aIRR 2.37 [1.05-5.35]; p = .0378) were associated with an increased risk for hypertransaminasemia when compared to anti-TNF-α agents. No differences were observed between different groups of biologics. Conventional therapies were not associated with new incident NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative information of the incidence of hepatic AEs could facilitate drug selection in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Multicenter Retrospective Study of Secukinumab Drug Survival in Psoriasis Patients in a Daily Practice Setting: A Long-Term Experience in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited and conflicting evidence over the real-world drug survival of secukinumab (SEC) in patients with psoriasis, especially in the long term. Our objective was to analyze the short- and long-term survival of SEC (S-SEC) and its predictive factors for the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS:  Patients clinically diagnosed with plaque psoriasis and under treatment with secukinumab (n = 384) in a daily practice setting were analyzed in a retrospective, multicenter study performed in a nationwide cohort and followed up for a period of 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted to analyze drug survival time, and log-rank test was performed to compare several groups. Factors related to speed of treatment discontinuation were studied with a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The overall cumulative secukinumab drug survival rates observed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 97.1%, 89.0%, 81.1%, and 74.3%, respectively. Obesity [hazard ratio (HR), 1.809, CI 95% 1.114-2.962; p = 0.004] and previous experience with biological therapies, particularly those who had been treated with ≥ 2 biologicals with different mechanisms of action (HR 3.476, CI 95% 1.875-6.444; p = 0.017) were associated with an early discontinuation, whereas psoriatic arthritis was associated with delayed discontinuation, (HR 0.493, CI 95% 0.265-0.917; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that cumulative secukinumab drug survival for psoriasis patients for the period 6-18 months was in the range of real-world evidence studies. Additionally, we observed a relatively high long-term survival rate at 24 months (74.3%).

A New Classification of the Severity of Psoriasis: What's Moderate Psoriasis?

The purpose of this study is to propose a ranking system for the severity of psoriasis. The consensus method of selecting the indices to include and the classification of real patient profiles by an expert panel to create a gold standard of severity were used. The performance of potential cut-offs was evaluated to create a ranking algorithm. The combined use of PASI, BSA, and sPGA may allow the classification of the severity of psoriatic patients. The final algorithm identifies severe patients in a single step (2 out 3 are met: PASI ≥ 11 or BSA ≥ 10 or sPGA ≥ 3), while two steps are required for mild ((2 out 3 are met: PASI ≤ 3 or BSA ≤ 5 or sPGA ≤ 2) and DLQI < 5) and moderate forms (the patient does not meet 2 out 3 (PASI ≥ 11 or BSA ≥ 10 or sPGA ≥ 3) but has a DLQI ≥ 5. A ranking algorithm is presented, consisting of different measures of disease which classifies psoriatic patients into three categories: mild, moderate, and severe.

Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts' recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) screening tools, examine their implementation in daily practice, and reach a consensus about the best screening tool for implementation in daily practice in different medical settings. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR), structured telephone interviews to hospitals, and a multidisciplinary nominal group meeting were all conducted. The SLR employed sensitive search strategies using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2020. Two reviewers independently selected articles that reported data on PsA screening tools and that included sufficient data to at least calculate the sensitivity and specificity of those tools (e.g., questionnaires, algorithms, specific questions, and biomarkers). The hospital interviews collected data regarding the process of suspected PsA diagnosis and referral to rheumatology, the implementation of PsA screening tools, and barriers and facilitators to implementation of those tools. In the nominal group meeting, a multidisciplinary team of experts discussed all these data and subsequently recommended a screening tool for implementation. RESULTS: The SLR included 41 moderate-quality studies that analyzed 14 PsA screening tools, most of which were questionnaire-based tools. All of these studies reported a moderate-good performance but presented different characteristics regarding the time to completion or the number and type of items or questions. The implementation of screening tools was low (30.5%). The experts ultimately recommended regular use of a PsA screening tool, preferably the PURE-4 questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of PsA screening tools like the PURE-4 questionnaire in daily practice likely improves the prognosis of PsA patients.

Effect of Sex in Systemic Psoriasis Therapy: Differences in Prescription, Effectiveness and Safety in the BIOBADADERM Prospective Cohort.

The effect of sex on systemic therapy for psoriasis has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to analyse a large multicentre Spanish cohort of 2,881 patients with psoriasis (58.3% males), followed from January 2008 to November 2018, to determine whether sex influences prescription, effectiveness of therapy, and the risk of adverse events. The results show that women are more likely than men to be prescribed biologics. There were no differences between men and women in effectiveness of therapy, measured in terms of drug survival. Women were more likely to develop adverse events, but the difference in risk was small and does not justify different management. Study limitations include residual confounding and the use of drug survival as a proxy for effectiveness.

The effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in psoriasis patients under clinical practice conditions: A Spanish multicentre retrospective study.

The objective of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in psoriasis patients under clinical practice conditions. Observational, retrospective, multicentre study that included patients with ixekizumab from March 2017 to March 2019. ≥ 90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and absolute PASI <2 were the parameters used to assess treatment response. Adverse events (AEs) were collected. Of the 301 patients included, 111 were women (36.9%), mean age was 48.5 (±13.5) years. Mean baseline PASI score was 13.5 (±7.7). More than half of the patients (68.5%) had received at least one biological drug before. At 3 months, 208 (76.5%) patients achieved PASI <2 and 156 (57.3%) PASI 90. At 12 months, 130 (73.4%) patients achieved absolute PASI <2 and 104 (58.7%) PASI 90. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior use of biologics was influential in achieving PASI <2 at both 3 and 12 months (OR 2.82, P = .006; OR 9.51, P < .001, respectively). Sixty-five patients (21.59%) exhibited at least one AE, injection site reaction was the most common (39; 36.8%). Likewise in trials, ixekizumab displayed an excellent profile of safety and efficacy also in real-life. Effectiveness appears superior in biologic-naive patients.

Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Phototherapy: An Observational Study.

The aim of this prospective study in a phototherapy unit was to describe adverse events (AEs) associated with discontinuation of phototherapy in a clinical setting. A total of 872 included patients received 1,256 courses of phototherapy treatment: 76.9% narrow-band UVB (NBUVB); 9.6% systemic psoralen plus UVA (PUVA); 11.4% topical PUVA; and 2.1% UVA. Approximately a fifth of the treatments (n = 240, 19.1%) were associated with AEs, the most frequent of which was erythema (8.8%). Systemic PUVA had the highest rate of AEs (32.5%). Mycosis fungoides was the dermatosis with the highest rate of AE (36.9%). A total of 216 (17.2%) patients stopped treatment: 23.6% because of AEs (4.1% of all treatments). Treatment suspension due to AEs was associated with PUVA, both topical and systemic (p < 0.001), and diagnoses of mycosis fungoides (p <0.001), palmoplantar psoriasis (p = 0.002), hand eczema (p = 0.002) and pityriasis lichenoides (p = 0.01). In conclusion, one in every 5 patients receiving phototherapy had an AE, but few stopped treatment for this reason.

Long-term safety of nine systemic medications for psoriasis: A cohort study using the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events for Biological Therapy in Dermatological Diseases (BIOBADADERM) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Registry studies broadly describing the safety of systemic drugs in psoriasis are needed. OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety findings of the systemic drugs acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, cyclosporine, etanercept, infliximab, methotrexate, secukinumab, and ustekinumab used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in patients included in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events for Biological Therapy in Dermatological Diseases (BIOBADADERM) Registry. METHODS: The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted IRR (including propensity scores) of identified adverse events for each drug, using methotrexate as reference, were determined by means of a prospective cohort. RESULTS: Our study included 2845 patients (8954 treatment cycles; 9642 patient-years). Ustekinumab and secukinumab had the lowest rate of adverse events for several of the system organ classes, with a statistically significant decreased rate ratio (IRR of <1), whereas cyclosporine and infliximab had the highest, with an increased rate ratio (IRR of ≥5). LIMITATIONS: Observational study, drug allocation not randomized, depletion of susceptibles, and prescribed doses not registered. CONCLUSION: Our data provide comparative safety information in the real-life setting that could help clinicians selecting between available products.

Análisis de la prueba de evaluación clínica objetiva estructurada (ECOE) de sexto curso en la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche / Analysis of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) of the sixth year in the School of Medicine of the Miguel Hernández University of Elche

INTRODUCCIÓN: La prueba evaluación clínica objetiva y estructurada (ECOE) es un método de evaluación de la competencia clínica con evidencia de validez, objetividad y confiabilidad. En este estudio nos propusimos analizar la prueba ECOE de los estudiantes de sexto del grado de medicina. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal de la prueba ECOE realizada en la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche en junio de 2016. RESULTADOS: En la prueba participaron 116 alumnos. Había 7 (35%) estaciones de paciente estandarizado, 5 (25%) estaciones de informe, 4 (20%) estaciones de maniquí/procedimiento y 4 (20%) estaciones de tipo examen oral estructurado. La mediana de la puntuación de los alumnos fue de 7,14 (recorrido intercuartílico: 6,90-7,43). La mediana de la puntuación de los alumnos del primer día por la mañana fue de 7,10, del primer día por tarde fue superior (7,14) y la del segundo día por la mañana también lo fue (7,24; p = 0,1). La estación con menor puntuación fue la de informe (6,41) y la estación con mayor puntuación fue la de maniquí/procedimiento (7,88) (p < 0,001). Dentro de las estaciones de paciente estandarizado (mediana = 7,12), los resultados de los alumnos fueron mejores en las que el paciente era un facultativo en formación (7,52) que en las que el paciente era un actor (6,82) (p < 0,001). El área competencial con mejor puntuación fue la de los aspectos éticos legales y profesionalismo (8,56), seguida de las habilidades de comunicación (7,79). CONCLUSIONES: El análisis de la prueba ECOE ha permitido comprender su naturaleza y las oportunidades de mejora que ofrece con vistas a futuras pruebas

INTRODUCTION: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a method of evaluating clinical competence with evidence of validity, objectivity, and reliability. In this study an analysis is presented of the OSCE by sixth-year medical students. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the OSCE carried out in the School of Medicine of the Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche in June 2016. RESULTS: The test involved 116 sixth-year students. The test consisted of 7(35%) standardised patient stations, 5 (25%) reporting stations, 4 (20%) mannequin/procedure stations, and 4 (20%) structured oral exam-type stations. The median student score was 7.14 (interquartile range: 6.90-7.43). The median score for the students on the first day in the morning was 7.10. On the first day in the afternoon it was higher (7.14) and also higher (7.24) on the second day in the morning, but with no statistically significant differences. The station with the lowest score was the report station (6.41), and the station with the highest score was the mannequin/procedure station (7.88) (P < .001). In the standardised patient stations (score: 7.12), the results of the students were better in those where the patient was a doctor in training (7.52) than in those where the patient was an actor (6.82) (P < .001). The highest-ranking of competence was legal ethics and professionalism (8.56), followed by communication skills (7.79) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the OSCE has led to understanding the nature of the test and the opportunities of improvement that it offers for future tests